On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 10:05:57AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I've browsed through the archives, and I remember > hearing Godmar say something about that assertion a > while ago ... here it is: > http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2002-August/008819.html > > So, does removing the assertion help? > > cheers, > dalibor topic
The diff is attached. See other mails re it helping or not. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://0.0.0.0:8889/rO4b9ZN~gNE/ ICTHUS.
Index: kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-jthreads/jthread.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/kaffe/kaffe/kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-jthreads/jthread.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -r1.89 jthread.c
--- kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-jthreads/jthread.c 11 Jan 2003 19:50:39 -0000
1.89
+++ kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-jthreads/jthread.c 23 Feb 2003 23:51:34 -0000
@@ -1747,7 +1747,7 @@
short ev = 0;
if (readQ[i] != 0) { /* FD_ISSET(i, &readsPending) */
ev |= POLLIN;
- assert(FD_ISSET(i, &readsPending));
+ /* assert(FD_ISSET(i, &readsPending)); -
http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2002-August/008819.html */
}
if (writeQ[i] != 0) { /* FD_ISSET(i, &writesPending) */
ev |= POLLOUT;
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
