Hi Kiyo, --- Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > > * kiyo's & tim's ssize_t vs size_t patch: unresolved. > I noticed that some 'old' linux boxes have 'ssize_t' definition. The real > problem is, it is not included when ByteToCharIconv.c or CharToByteIconv.c > are compiled. So my propose for fixing this problem is the patch attached. > > Could you review my patch and if it looks feasible please check in?
looks fine to me. I'll add a comment about linux 2.0 and check it in. Thanks! cheers, dalibor topic __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
