Alan Eliasen wrote: >>I am afraid the change of kaffe/kaffevm/locks.c to Revision 1.48 >>did something wrong. > > Thank you--this does affect the behavior. I reverted the change made in > locks.c revision 1.48 (only one line was changed in that revision) and the > first regression test that I posted here (the class called BigIntTest) now works.
Upon further testing, although it makes that case work, the general reliability isn't improved. Many other numbers cause the same failures as before. It's still not clear what conditions cause this to hang, or segfault. It appears to be sensitive to the order of calculations. -- Alan Eliasen | "You cannot reason a person out of a [EMAIL PROTECTED] | position he did not reason himself http://futureboy.homeip.net/ | into in the first place." | --Jonathan Swift _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
