Kiyo Inaba wrote:
I said

By the way, aren't there anyone who volunteer to modify jit-xxx.def
to be compatible with jit3-xxx.def? Originally these two files are
very close, but when we remove some warning these two files (or
precisely speaking pairs of these files) becomes much different.
This make me so hard to check the behavior of jit3-m68k.def against
jit-m68k.def...
>>
# Or shall I do that? :-)


I made patch for i386 and m68k.
This patch works fine for i686-linux (--with-engine=jit).

Hi Kiyo,

thanks a lot for the patch, I've checked it in.

It makes me much easier to tackle the question why jit3 for m68k
does not work properly, in the (near) future.

Currently, there are three more CPUs (alpha, arm, sparc) which
support jit but not converted to this new style, and I plan to make
mod for them later.

Thanks. I'll have a go at converting them right now, if you don't mind, as I want the fix the cross-compiles for debian-alpha/arm/sparc asap so that I can push updated tarballs to Arnaud for build testing. :)


cheers,
dalibor topic

_______________________________________________
kaffe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe

Reply via email to