Alexander Boettcher wrote:
Hi,
is it useful/possible to use "kwrite" instead of "write" in the kaffe/kaffevm/debug.c ? (see diff).
I use it when stderr(2) is not opened or another filedescriptor is used for the output. Then the implementation of the syscall interface can change the behavior.
I use it for Kaffe with our DROPS. Kaffe now runs as a native application, ;-) , on our microkernel Fiasco and the L4 environment. (http://wwwos.inf.tu-dresden.de/drops). I plan to update my cvs state of kaffe (february) with the current one and therefore I submit this proposal/patch, which could be useful for you (and for me ;-) ).
Hi Alexander,
I don't see any reason to keep the old syscall way. It is interesting to use the abstract layer at that place too (with greater portability of the debug layer in mind).
Thanks, I'll commit it today.
BTW, New ports are always really welcome for our hall of fame. ;-) So please send. :-)
Regards,
Guilhem Lavaux.
_______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
