>>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dalibor> Mikolaj Habryn wrote: >> On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 14:10, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> >>> Sounds like a good guess. Could you reconfigure and try again >>> using libffi? >> Didn't change the situation, alas. I'm faintly suspicious of >> libffi; I had thought that it didn't support MIPS (and the MIPS >> habit of changing the calling convention for leaf vs non-leaf >> functions makes me wonder how libffi manages at all!) but I'm still >> poking at it. Dalibor> Hi Mikolaj, Dalibor> I've CC:ed Casey, who's been hacking on libffi for MIPS Dalibor> recently. You may want to drag out libffi straight from gcc Dalibor> CVS, as no gcc release contains Casey's fixes yet afaik. Yeah, my (and David Daney's) fixes are in GCC CVS right now, but note that it probably only has support (at least, support for closures) on the O32 ABI. I don't know how well calling works on N32 or N64, but it is presumably ok. Does Kaffe use calls only, or closures? If it is only calls, then MIPS support should be pretty good for any ABI. -- Casey Marshall || [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
