El S�bado, 9 de Abril de 2005 10:50, Michael Koch escribi�: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 10:57:15AM -0500, Gustavo Guillermo P�rez wrote: > > Hello, I was reading the licens of Jikes and I see is not GNU/GPL, why is > > the default compiler for the classpath instead of Kopi Java Compiler, I > > noted that javac is pointing to jikes and I don't want to mix this kind > > of licences. > > Wrong: GNU classpath's default compiler is GCJ. > > > I try to use kcj with an earlier compiled kaffe binary but hangs class > > compilation, and I noticed the build process finish a lot faster than > > before with jikes. > > Jikes is free. Just not GPL. That is no problem. Much good software is > free but not GPL, see the BSD and Apache licenses.
That is that I was don't know, and of course jikes is a lot faster. > > There is any problem with kcj, that makes forcing the use of jikes? > > Which are the advantages? > > - KJC is full of bugs, much more then jikes. I see, ok, I was just ask, becouse I see the article of Richard Stallman called "the trap of java". http://programming.newsforge.com/programming/04/04/07/2021242.shtml And I'm confused about. > - KJC was included in kaffe as binary blob which is a no-no for > distributions like Debian. > > You are free to work on KJC to make it better and to include it as > source in kaffe. > > > Michael -- Gustavo Guillermo P�rez Compunauta uLinux www.ulinux.tk _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [email protected] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
