Hi Ioannis,
This is good news that at least the fix seems to correct most of the
problems. Concerning the cpu usage with pthreads I expect it is correct
that it really eats all the CPU (actually your test is meant to no ? :-))
The problem with jthreads is a bit more worrying. We really need to
investigate this issue. I will try to run the same tests for as long on
some computer I have to check if it is reproduceable.
Good luck with cross-compilation !
Regards,
Guilhem.
Ioannis Liverezas wrote:
Hi Guilhem,
I 've tested your fix on x86 with pthreads and it has been running for a whole
day. On the other hand It seems that it generates high CPU usage and the
system seems almost frozen. I could hardly move the mouse pointer. The
testing host is a Centrino 1.6GHz laptop.
I 've also tested x86 with jthreads.The jthreads system runs smoother and
stresses the cpu less, but after a lot of hours (15.5) it failed:
Thread: Time100 :sync :1 Alive:15/03/2006, 06:20:25.843
Test started at 14/03/2006, 14:53:09.864
SLEEP INTERRUPTED
TimeA15000: i = 1000011100499
Thread: TimeA15000 :sync :1 Alive:15/03/2006, 06:20:26.419
kaffe-bin: jthread.c:2452: jmutex_unlock: Assertion `tid->status != 1'
failed.
Aborted
Maybe I should dedicate a pc to run the pthreads test for some days to make
sure that it is ok.
I 'm trying to crosscompile and try on ARM (PXA 255), but I face some
difficulties, possibly with zlib. I 'll let you know as soon as I make some
progress with cross compiling
Regards,
Ioannis Liverezas
_______________________________________________
kaffe mailing list
kaffe@kaffe.org
http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
_______________________________________________
kaffe mailing list
kaffe@kaffe.org
http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
