On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: > Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, I'm not an expert in this, but I don't know if this really would > > > > make > > > > any improvement. With hardware acceleration you "just" throw your > > > > bytecode > > > > at the CPU and it processes it just as if it were native code. So, I > > > > don't > > > > see how JIT could be useful here. Also, it is unlikely to make our work > > > > easier, or would it? I'd go as simple as possible to start with. > > > > > > > You mignt mean Jazelle like technology actually. > > > > Yes, this is exactly what I mean by "hardware accelerated Java on AVR32" and > > what Atmel calls "Java Extension Module (JEM)." The main difference is, that > > JEM documentation is publically accessible, and Jazelle isn't. > > > That sounds very very great . Would you provide me a link to this > documentation or otherwise I may ask Mr. google :)
First link when googling for "avr32 java" is http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc32049.pdf :-) Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list kaffe@kaffe.org http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
