On 20 Jun 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> But it seems that I'm alone in the ``deep understanding'' of the
> underlying assumptions of Jitterbug. I wonder if Andrew Tridgell and
> Dan Shearer share this sensation with me... Or maybe it's I that just
> don't get it, and the `Message type's are just a useless concept in
> Jitterbug, that's going to be dropped in the next release... :-(
Isn't it clear that the inability to search on two types (alternately, the
lack of a closed type) is a simple and obvious deficiency in jitterbug,
and that fixing it would a) take less time than this argument and b) make
everybody happy?
Andrew
