Patrick Tullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Its always easier to wrap a flexible interface an present it as a less
> flexible one, so I suggest going with the 'this' pointer approach. If
> it turns out that all the JVMDI code in the world is written to the
> singleton, no-this-pointer approach it should be pretty easy to wrap.
> Going the other way is much harder, I think.
I think I agree with Patrick. And I've pretty much written it already
using the 'this' approach. I need to resolve a few issues in my
implementation and then I'll give up the code. At this point it's
only a skeleton interface, no real functionality. I started with the
non-this approach but then changed to the this approach, so it's fairly
easy to go either way...
