OK, how about we remove the closure client for now, since it is not a thin wrapper and is not being maintained. Any objections?
Thanks, On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Chris Burroughs <chris.burrou...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 10/25/2011 12:41 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > > We are getting close to cut a new RC for 0.7 release. Before we do that, > I > > want to ask people's opinion about those not well maintained non-java > > clients. Currently, at least Ruby and Closure are not well maintained > > (little or no activities). I am thinking about deleting those clients > from > > A general point. The Clojure client doesn't seem to use the java/scala > api. If someone wanted to, it would probably be possible to write a > clojure client as a thin wrapper instead of re-implementation (and thus > get access to the high level consumer, etc.) > > > our svn for now. If those clients exist in github, we can probably leave > a > > forward pointer in a README in our Apache repository (is this ok with > > Apache?). > > Sounds good to me. >
