There is currently no plan for doing that. However, if you think this is a useful feature, please create a jira so that we can track it.
Thanks, Jun On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Eric Tschetter <eched...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I can do that (that's actually how our current stuff works as > well), I was just hoping to maybe remove the need to tell my producer > to connect to localhost so that it can talk to some other part of the > code running in the same process. > > Do you think you will ever have a Producer object implemented in terms > of a KafkaServer object? Or, if that were to exist would you be > willing to take on the maintenance of it as part of the public API? > > --Eric > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Eric, > > > > Try using the Producer api. Internal apis are subject to change in the > > future and are not officially supported. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Eric Tschetter <eched...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I'm setting up an HTTP endpoint that just takes a posted object and > >> shoves it into Kafka. I'm imagining this as basically an embedded > >> broker in my producer and am wondering if there's a way to emit > >> messages directly into the broker without actually setting up a > >> Producer object? Or, is it just going to be simpler and more > >> supported for me if I actually set up the separate objects and have > >> them talk via whatever mechanism they end up talking via? > >> > >> --Eric > >> >
