Here is a sample. The highlighted lines are those showing different sizes in du and ls
*du output * 513M ./00000001197773741184.kafka 1.0G ./00000001200458096891.kafka 1.0G ./00000001200994968784.kafka 1.0G ./00000001201531839884.kafka 1.0G ./00000001202068711094.kafka 513M ./00000001011479389046.kafka *ls output * -rw-r--r-- 1 kafka kafka 536871053 Aug 8 13:01 00000001197773741184.kafka -rw-r--r-- 1 kafka kafka 536871893 Aug 8 13:36 00000001200458096891.kafka -rw-r--r-- 1 kafka kafka 536871100 Aug 8 13:45 00000001200994968784.kafka -rw-r--r-- 1 kafka kafka 536871210 Aug 8 13:49 00000001201531839884.kafka -rw-r--r-- 1 kafka kafka 536871063 Aug 8 14:00 00000001202068711094.kafka -rw-r--r-- 1 kafka kafka 536871139 Aug 6 07:02 00000001011479389046.kafka On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > The mailing list does not accept attachments - you will need to either > paste here or externally, say on gist. > > Thanks, > > Joel > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:52 PM, xiaoyu wang <xiaoyu.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Neha, > > > > I have attached the du and ls output for one of the partitions. Looks > like > > for some segments, du is showing 1GB while ls shows 513MB. Let me know if > > you need additional info. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Xiaoyu > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> Xiaoyu, > >> > >> Please could you paste the log statements that specify which files are > >> deleted by the broker and also the detailed output by du on the Kafka > >> log directory ? > >> If the broker says it has garbage collected some log segments, space > >> should free up. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Neha > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:22 PM, xiaoyu wang <xiaoyu.w...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I am running kafka-0.7.0 and found that even though expired segments > are > >> > deleted by broker, the disk space is not released. So, du shows that a > >> > partition is 450 GB, but the total size of the files in the partition > is > >> > only about 250GB. Is this a bug? We are using raid10. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > -Xiaoyu > >> > > > > >
