On 01/28/2015 12:12 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
Hi Mads,
I can promise that your use case will keep working in the future if you add
test coverage for it ;-)
Is there any coverage already related to pull requests and possibly
pull request updates? I don't see any.
It would indeed be much better to have all this tested, but without a
good example I'm a bit at lost here.
I think you are right that there not is any test coverage of this area.
The existing tests use a unittest framework but it is not unittests at
all. That makes it a bit painful to maintain. Still, it is better than
nothing ... if we have tests.
I guess a test would have to build a hg repo with the right structure,
invoke Kallithea, and verify that the html output has the expected content.
There is also
https://bitbucket.org/conservancy/kallithea/pull-request/33/add-first-robotframework-pullrequest-test
. It is even more high level and more "realistic" but probably also
slower ... and it doesn't work when I try to use it.
/Mads
_______________________________________________
kallithea-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
