On 02/19/2015 11:07 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
- c.cs_repo: what does 'cs' stand for here? This could become src_repo
'cs' is for changesets, referring to the side where the changes happened.
I think the advantage of the current naming is that it refers to what it
_is_ not to what we might happen to use it for or how we interpret it.
Would "changed_repo" be OK?
- c.a_repo: what does 'a' stand for here?? This could become dest_repo.
The 'a' was meant to refer to the ancestor used for comparing.
And expanding this out to "ancestor_repo"?
Now you've explained them, I think changed & ancestor make sense as
terminology, but the "cs" and "a" abbreviations are arguably a bit
*too* abbreviated for clarity.
They are also used in a lot of places where it is nice to keep it brief.
We could perhaps just make it more clear what it is an abbreviation of.
Btw: Another "interpretation" of 'a' is as the 'a' side of a diff.
/Mads
_______________________________________________
kallithea-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
