Hello, On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 06:58:30 +0100 Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdeping...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then with this wrapper, can't we also change the cookie name to > append the port, as an alternative to my recent patch fixing it in > the config file? In theory, yes, but I'm not sure we should :) I'm not sure however, the port is the only thing to distinguish between different services. If it were me, I'd have different services running on the same port, but I'd had them available at different domains. Given that, I think your original patch might be better. -- Cheers, Andrew _______________________________________________ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
