On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Brianna Laugher > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ...And you don't get failures from running >> KALLITHEA_WHOOSH_TEST_DISABLE=1 KALLITHEA_NO_TMP_PATH=1 nosetests >> kallithea/tests/functional/ >> ? Because I do. >> >> Ran 383 tests in 125.998s >> FAILED (SKIP=5, errors=10, failures=19) >> >> I put some print statements into load_environment and it looks to me that >> running under pytest, it is respecting those settings. > > Hmm, indeed, I also see failures with nose. > Is it because we're passing an explicit limited test set? > Has something changed since before? I'll check it out on 0.1 soon...
Confirmed failing too on Kallithea. I guess this is due to passing a limited set of tests, since running without arguments works fine. Although this shouldn't block pytest adoption, it would be great if this can be fixed at some point. Best regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ kallithea-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
