On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 18:06 +0200, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > On 09/09/2015 01:40 PM, Dominik Ruf wrote: > > > > 2. Should pull requests still be handled on bitbucket? > > I'm a big believer in 'eating your own dog food' so I'd suggest to > > go away > > from bitbucket and instead use https://kallithea-scm.org/repos/. > > I agree. But also, Kalilthea is not really optimized for being a > public > bitbucket-like instance with "random" users. It might however work if > > someone wants to admin that and keep an eye on users and prevent > abuse. > It could be an easy start if we start out by only giving access to > known > contributors/reviewers.
As I've mentioned before, I've been very interested in using it for Samba, and for that it would need it to be semi-public. Indeed, even better would be if we could (as a fellow SFC project) use a shared instance, but that might be too hard :-) What I can share is our experience with our wiki. We require that users e-mail us (with a real e-mail client, we don't implement a web form) to gain access, describing in a sentence or two what they wish to do as their initial contribution. That seems to have kept the abuse down. For authentication, I haven't made it work yet (and I'm not sure how available it will be long term), but I am keen on the idea of using Mozilla persona, apache and mod_auth_persona, so I don't have to secure a password DB. (In the meantime, I've just started integrating Samba with github as a mirror, to get a broader exposure). Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba _______________________________________________ kallithea-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
