On 12 February 2016 at 23:59, Thomas De Schampheleire (no-reply) <[email protected]> wrote: > Same as v1, but with better commit msgs and an extra patch to fix test > interdependency. Also, as requested, changes made on a branch.
Acttually, I disagree with Mads' opinion on branches: 1) The end result will be on the branch default (or stable, depending on what sort of changes it is) anyway 2) If the PR doesn't require any more work, it can be simply pulled if it's on the right branch 3) I can't say bookmarks don't provide the same visibility as named branches do, but at least there can be just one bookmark with the said name, which means it's always the most recent version of the PR. In any case, I suggest not just closing old PR versions, but also obsoleting them (for exampl, using rebase or histedit), so that the old changesets don't hang around needlessly. -- Cheers, Andrew _______________________________________________ kallithea-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
