Hi all,

Like most companies these days we are heavy users of Git, and our primary 
repository management solution  is based on Gerrit, where we are active in the 
open source community, along with Google, SAP, CollabNet and others.

As part of my role, I have been monitoring Kallithea and this mailing list for 
some time, but as Thomas says there is an issue with perception. (I also 
monitor the commercial alternatives like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, and so on 
as well).

So here are a few thoughts that may help (or not!!) ...

If you are not releasing regularly you tend to slip off the radar. Having the 
most recent release being over a year old would demonstrate that the project is 
dead in the opinion of some. The mailing list shows a different view, of 
course, as does Openhub.net
https://www.openhub.net/p/kallithea

Developing without releasing means that features are just not getting out there 
to organizations that may want to adopt Kallithea.

As Thomas says, the release numbering also shows that Kallithea has not reached 
version 1 yet. If you are going to use an open source component as the primary 
way for managing repos containing your company's intellectual property then you 
are looking for something that has reached a level of maturity at which the 
community developing it is prepared to declare that the project is mature 
enough to at least start at 1.0!

So, from my perspective this is a really good move and puts Kallithea on the 
map, instead of in the heap marked 'pending'. 

We aren't using Kallithea yet, but this is going in the right direction!

I know the above takes a 'company' view of this, and of course this is not the 
whole picture. 

Regards

David Bainbridge

Ericsson

DAVID BAINBRIDGE
Product Manager SW Development
Strategic Product Manager, Configuration and Compliance Management
BNEP EITTE SP&S Platforms&Infrastructure

[email protected]
www.ericsson.com


-----Original Message-----
From: kallithea-general [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Thomas De Schampheleire
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 15:21
To: Kallithea <[email protected]>
Subject: Release plans for Kallithea

All,

The last release of Kallithea dates back to more than a year ago, so we really 
need to make a new one, or better yet, three new ones. I had a chat with Mads 
and Andrew about it, and here is the proposed plan:

1. Stable release 0.3.3
First, create 0.3.3 based on the stable branch. In addition to the changes 
already on stable since 0.3.2, I have selected a number of changes from the 
default branch that I think should make it to 0.3.3. These changes are mostly 
bug fixes but also some small generic improvements with no risk.
These proposed extra changes can be reviewed at:
https://bitbucket.org/conservancy/kallithea/pull-requests/352

2. Feature release 0.9
On the default branch there has been a lot of development since release 0.3, 
the last merge from default to stable (now almost two years ago). There are the 
big patch sets: migration from nose to pytest, migration from Pylons to 
TurboGears2, and the ongoing migration from custom styling to Bootstrap. And 
obviously there have been many other changes as well.
The plan is to finish the migration to Bootstrap and then create a 0.9 feature 
release. Any problems reported on 0.9 will be fixed and lead to the long 
awaited...

3. Release 1.0
As discussed recently, there are people/companies that do not consider 
Kallithea an option just because the version number is still in the 0.x range.
Moreover, the renewal of the test framework (pytest), Python backend
(TurboGears2) and frontend styling (Bootstrap) is an appropriate time to mark 
the 1.0 milestone.
In terms of features, the 1.0 release will be similar to the 0.9 release but 
with any reported problems fixed.


Feedback welcome!

Best regards,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
kallithea-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
_______________________________________________
kallithea-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general

Reply via email to