On 07/18/2017 08:35 AM, Dominik Ruf wrote:
Mads Kiilerich <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> schrieb am Di., 18. Juli 2017 um 01:10 Uhr:

    Hosting of code from open source contributors requires some continous
    amount of work and resources. Both for establishing trust and for
cleaning up when rogue players abuse the system anyway.
How is that different onbitbucket.org <http://bitbucket.org/>?
What kind of abuse do you suspect?

Bitbucket do (for the same reason) have a legal department, constant monitoring, and people and process for dealing with DMCA takedown notices and similar. If we open loopholes where anybody can make anything available for download, it will be abused for hosting illegal content.

    But it can be
    done, assuming we want to do it and establish a realistic process and
    tooling.

    Also, Kallithea is mainly used internally inside organisations. It has
    not been optimized for hosting open source projects with "random"
contributors. I think some of the short-comings are quite obvious
Not to me.

Before I would host a fully public site with self-registration and untrusted users, I would want more isolation between users, quotas, and for example a concept of a user home. One current show-stopper-ish feature is the need for subscribing to be CCed on all PRs and comments for a repo.

    - we
don't need dogfooding to find these. It is not only about finding issues. It also send a message to potential users.
Would you eat at McDonalds, if their employees eat at Burger King?

I would have even more dislike for McDonalds if their employees *only* ate McDonalds food. McDonalds might be good for some purposes, but it is not a solution to all problems and not a full diet.

Kallithea has mainly been developed and seen improvements for use inside organizations. It is not so much built for hosting open source projects. That would have other requirements that probably are less relevant to the main use case. We *could* use it for Kallithea, but I don't have a problem with admitting that this is not a use case we have aimed for so far.

It would be nice to use non-proprietary software, but I don't have a big problem with Bitbucket as long as the repos are in a standard format that can be used anywhere ... and are mirrored on our own infrastructure with free software.

But if Andrew configure account for you (and other trusted contributors), then it is perfectly fine to use our own Kallithea for PRs.

/Mads
_______________________________________________
kallithea-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general

Reply via email to