On Jan 14, 8:36 am, Michael Sparks <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 03:58:20 [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Added:
> >     branches/private_JMB_WSGISupport/
> >        - copied from r6018, /branches/private_JMB_HTTPSupport/
>
> > Log:
> > Branching WSGI stuff into own branch off of private_JMB_HTTPSupport.
>
> That doesn't make any sense - the branch "private_JMB_HTTPSupport" won't be
> merged onto /trunk - so I assume that this branch isn't intended to be put up
> for merge at any point. (The branch "private_JMB_MPS_HTTPSupport" is a branch
> off private_JMB_HTTPSupport for the sole reason of refining that branch for
> either merge or rejection - private_JMB_WSGISupport doesn't have that aim)
>
> If you do mean for this branch to be merged, please chat about this
> beforehand - since this doesn't make any sense at present.
>
> Michael.
> --http://yeoldeclue.com/bloghttp://twitter.com/kamaelianhttp://www.kamaelia.org/Home

I did intend for it to be merged as soon as I get the stuff from WSGI
into it.  The reason I branched it off of private_JMB_HTTPSupport is
that it uses some of the HTTP stuff that's in there.  I figured that
since you said you were leaving behind a stub for the names in it,
this would all work out.

Is there a better way to be doing this?  Or would it be better for me
to wait until you get private_JMB_MPS_HTTPSupport merged?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"kamaelia" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to