My apologies. If you have time, feel free to answer me whenever you get the chance. Otherwise, I'll ask again after New Years. :-)
On Dec 24, 1:36 pm, Michael Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > Jason, > > This is very bad timing. Ask this question again when it's not holiday season. > > Regards, > > Michael. > > > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Jason Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know it's been a while since I've looked at Kamaelia, but I might > > have a usecase for it at my current job. Performance is an area > > that's really hurting us right now, and I've been asked to parallelize > > some of our data loads. > > > Last time I checked, the Process Pipeline and Process Graphline where > > highly experimental (and that's still where they are listed). Are > > they any more stable or mature now? > > > Alternatively, I could also work with a ProcessComponent using > > multiprocessing. It looks like it wouldn't be *too* difficult to > > adapt a ThreadedComponent to do this (although there may be some > > "devil's in the details" type things). The only issue that I forsee > > is that multiprocessing has been backported to python 2.4/2.5. Is > > Kamaelia still aiming to be compatible with Python 2.3? > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "kamaelia" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kamaelia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia?hl=en.
