Quoting Hannes Erven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Sergio, > > > > I'm a new Kandula user and I'm tryng to collect as more failure data as > > possible to construct a statistical model of the reliability of some ws > > frameworks. > > Yes, I guess kandula isn't (yet) used in production at the moment, so > its user base is very small. > > Kandula has - that's my personal opinion - still a long way to go until > it reaches production quality. Moreover, kandula is the solution to a > requirement that very few applications have today. >
I agree with Hannes. When we started kandula in 2004 there was only one other transactions implementation known to us and that was with IBM. At the time there was this famous Gates-Mills demo between IBM and MSFT but later we learnt that MSFT used some internal code to interop with IBM. In March 2006, we tried to interop kandula2 with MSFT but even then their implementation was not working properly. If you look at the specs, WS-AT spec has a lot of reliability stuff in it which I think needs to be taken off. Then again the bridging between j2ee and web services transactions provided by kandula is entirely experimental at present. --dasarath > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
