Hi Simon, Wish you too a very happy new year and really sorrry for the late reply.
Thank you very much for the information and what we are planning to do is to discuss the issues which are not clearly defined in the specification in the mailing list and come up with solutions. Hope we would be able to clarify things and to we'll be able to come up with a good ws-ba impl for kandula2... Thanx again. regards Bimalee On 1/2/07, Simon Zambrovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Happy new Year. Sorry for late response. I've been out of office between Christmas and New Year. I've implemented a proof-of-concept prototype of WS-BA in late 2004. I used Apache AXIS as the WS-Engine. I also contacted Kandula people planning the implementation and tried to get someone in order to share my knowledge about the implementation problems but without any progress. So the main problem you will be faced during your implementation are things that are ommited / not clearly defined in the WS-BA specification. By the way, the WS-AT specification is much clearer and defines enough in order to implement the protocol. My implementation is hosted at Sourceforge and an industry paper has been published about it on IEEE CEC-2005. Feel free to ask concrete questions, if any… -- *Dipl. Ing. Simon Zambrovski* Research Assistant *Hamburg** University** of Technology* Institute of Telematics Schwarzenbergstrasse 95 D-21073 Hamburg Phone: +49 40 428783704 ------------------------------ *Von:* bimalee salpitikorala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2006 09:40 *An:* [email protected] *Betreff:* Re: WS-Business Activity Specification Implementation for Apache Kandula2 Hi all, Thanx for the information.. We'll keep in touch about the progress.. I think it would be worth if you two can share your designs with us, so that we can come up with a design which will capture the good points from both of your work. Hannes, We would be more than glad to reuse your code for the maximum extent.. For that we would like to know about the time line that you'll be able to get it committed to Apache... Thanx again, Bimalee
