Defaults Pose Latest Snag In Islamic-Bond Market
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124510859262816907.html

Wall Street Journal | JUNE 16, 2009
By STEPHEN FIDLER

LONDON -- The once-booming market for Islamic-friendly bonds, having suffered a 
contraction amid the credit crisis, now faces a new challenge: default.

The fledgling market in recent months experienced its first two defaults, and 
they aren't expected to be the last as issuers like Saad Group hit financial 
difficulties. This is taking investors and courts into uncharted territory as 
they seek to apply Western laws to bonds that were designed to comply with 
Islamic law, or Shariah.

In what could prove to be a test case, a bankruptcy judge in Louisiana is 
deciding the fate of holders of bonds tied to bankrupt energy firm East Cameron 
Partners LP, which in 2006 became the first U.S. company to issue the most 
popular type of Islamic-friendly instrument, known as a sukuk. One question: 
whether the bondholders actually own a portion of the company's oil and gas.

As such cases work their way through courts, or are resolved without court 
intervention, "they may give some guidance to investors on the default of sukuk 
and how this would be resolved," says Mohamed Damak, an analyst with ratings 
firm Standard & Poor's in Paris.

Sukuk bonds get around the Islamic ban on speculation and paying interest by 
using devices such as sale-repurchase deals.

Although based on centuries-old religious law, the sukuk market has been a 
21st-century phenomenon. More than $115 billion of such bonds have been issued 
since the turn of the century, buoyed by money from oil-rich Middle Eastern 
investors and non-Islamic players such as hedge funds, which accounted for as 
much as 80% of some issues.

In 2007 alone, issuers of sukuk raised some $46.6 billion, according to figures 
from the London-based Islamic Finance Information Service, or IFIS. Then, says 
Muneer Khan, Dubai-based partner with the Simmons & Simmons law firm, there was 
"a double whammy for the sukuk market." Even as the global financial crisis and 
falling oil prices took a severe toll, investors had to digest the implications 
of a "back to basics" movement among some scholars in Shariah law.

The recent defaults are only the latest twist for a market that has seen its 
fair share of growing pains over the past two years.

In 2007, respected Pakistani scholar Muhammad Taqi Usmani delivered a 
bombshell, suggesting that the most popular type of sukuk structures, 
responsible for up to 85% of issues, were unlawful according to Islam. The 
problem: They offered partial or total guarantees of repayments or of annual 
distributions, which ran counter to the Islamic principle that parties to a 
financial transaction must share in the risks and rewards attached to it. Last 
year, the Bahrain-based Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic 
Financial Institutions formally ruled such structures weren't Shariah-compliant.

The ruling wasn't retrospective, so Muslims didn't have to unload past 
investments. But it had a chilling effect: In all of 2008, only $15.8 billion 
in sukuk were issued, according to IFIS. Mr. Taqi Usmani "didn't realize how 
much his views mattered," says Dawood Ahmedji, director of Islamic Finance at 
Deloitte LLP.

Then came the defaults. In October, East Cameron Gas Co. filed for bankruptcy 
protection after its offshore Louisiana oil and gas wells failed to yield the 
expected returns, partly because of hurricane damage. Some $167.8 million of 
sukuk bonds were affected. And last month, Investment Dar Co., a Kuwaiti 
investment company that owns a 50% stake in luxury-car maker Aston Martin 
Lagonda Ltd., missed a payment on a $100 million sukuk, becoming the first 
company from the Middle East to default on Islamic bonds. Such defaults have 
the potential to be complicated. Many bonds were issued under Western law, 
which can conflict with Islamic principles. In a 2004 case relating to the 
enforceability of a contract, the U.K. Appeals Court ruled that when Shariah 
and English law conflict, English law takes precedence.

The structure of sukuk bonds can invite challenges and delays as Western 
bankruptcy judges accustomed to traditional bonds try to figure out where sukuk 
holders belong in the line of creditors, and even whether they are creditors or 
owners.

In the East Cameron case, for example, the company argued that there had been 
no real transfer of ownership of production revenues, known as royalties, into 
a "special-purpose vehicle" formed to issue the sukuk. Instead, they claimed 
the transaction was really a loan secured on those royalties. That would mean 
the sukuk holders would have to share the royalties with other creditors in the 
event of a liquidation.

The bankruptcy judge, Robert Summerhays, has so far rejected this contention.

He ruled, according to court records, that "holders invested in the sukuk 
certificates in reliance of the characterization of the transfer of the royalty 
interest as a true sale." He gave East Cameron leave to find further arguments 
to support its case, but if he maintains his position, the sukuk holders' 
rights will be strengthened.

Mr. Damak says the sukuk market has the potential to rebound once such issues 
are resolved. He estimates there are more than $50 billion of sukuk in the 
pipeline awaiting the right market opportunity.

The market has in fact managed to come back modestly -- but only for higher 
quality issuers. So far this year, more than $7.6 billion of sukuk have been 
issued, IFIS data show. Almost all this year's fund-raisers have been 
governments or government-related, the overwhelming majority from southeast 
Asian countries such as Indonesia. The Middle Eastern market that drove the 
pre-2007 boom has also sprung into life this month with a $500 million issue 
for the government of Bahrain, which was boosted to $750 million because of 
strong demand.

According to a 2007 study by economists from the International Monetary Fund, 
sukuk have delivered lower returns to investors than conventional bonds and are 
more often illiquid, meaning they are hard to buy and sell in the secondary 
market.













 

_________________________________________________________________
Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kantakji Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kantakjigroup?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

رد على