Islamic Banking Special Supplement: Shari’ah governance a challenge to Islamic 
banking
Sat. October 10, 2009; Posted: 09:48 PM 
 http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2573711/#
 
Oct 11, 2009 (Arab News - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- 
FISI| Quote| Chart| News| PowerRating-- A number of statements, resolutions and 
judgments relating to Islamic banking that have been issued and passed during 
the last two years have rekindled the debate over the very nature of the 
Shariah governance process in the global Islamic finance industry. 
These included Resolution 179 (19/5) on Tawarruq issued by the International 
Council of Fiqh Academy in April 2009; the statement issued by the Shariah 
Committee of the Accounting
and Auditing Organization of Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) in Bahrain 
in February 2008 relating to musharaka and mudaraba sukuk; and the judgment of 
the Malaysian Appeal Court in April 2009 that the Al-Bai Bithaman Ajil (BBA) 
deferred payment contract as practiced in Malaysia is a valid Islamic sale 
contract. 
It is true that no Islamic financial transaction can be closed without the 
sign-off of the Shariah Advisory Board as to whether the transaction or 
structure satisfies the tenets of Fiqh Al-Muamalat (Islamic law relating to 
financial transactions). In many markets, the reputation of the so-called top 
tier of international Shariah advisories do not mean much as retail customers 
in particular prefer to have the input of their local imam or Shariah scholar. 
This is a potentially a major problem for the development of the sector because 
not every local imam or Shariah scholar is conversant with the rubrics of Fiqh 
Al-Muamalat, which is a highly complex yet under-developed area of Islamic 
jurisprudence. 
The Islamic finance sector not only has a human capital development challenge 
but, perhaps equally importantly, also a Shariah advisory development 
challenge. While the universities and specialized academies are now starting to 
offer academic and training courses in this respect, they are still few and far 
between and their curricula are at best mixed and not quality controlled. 
The failure to develop educational best practice and independent governance at 
universities in most Muslim countries has stunted the institutional development 
of these institutions, which has resulted in an unfortunate inertia that has 
failed to recognize the main and unique chance that Islamic finance brings to 
Muslim countries and societies. Malaysia is a notable exception, for which 
other country has set up three trusts with a combined volume of funds totaling 
700 million ringgits dedicated to education in Islamic finance, the training of 
Shariah scholars for the sector and conducting research in Fiqh Al-Muamalat. 
The International Centre for Education in Islamic Finance (INCEIF), armed with 
a trust fund of 500 million ringgits, has ambitions of becoming the INSEAD and 
Harvard Business School for Islamic Finance. Bank Negara Malaysia, the central 
bank's 100 million ringgits Shariah Development Fund aims to offer scholarships 
to aspiring qualified Shariah advisories both from Malaysia and abroad. The 
International Shariah Research Academy for Islamic Finance (ISRA), also with a 
trust fund of 100 million ringgits, specializes in conducting research in Fiqh 
Al-Muamalat and in compiling a database of fatwas (Islamic legal opinions). 
Organizations such as the International Council of Fiqh Academy in Makkah, the 
Shariah Committee of Rabitah (World Muslim Congress) in Makkah, and the Shariah 
Committee of the AAOIFI in Bahrain are frontline organizations dealing with the 
issuing of fatwas and perhaps increasingly also debating the consequences of 
their opinions. 
They are not training institutions nor do they have the capacity and 
independent governance structures to teach Fiqh Al-Muamalat. 
Although there is a clamor for standardization or uniformity of Shariah 
interpretations, this is unrealistic given the various Madhabs (schools of 
Islamic law). In any case, even in conventional finance there is no uniformity 
of rules and laws, and can differ even within one country as in the US where 
the state laws on banking differ from each other. 
The late Azharite Shariah scholar, Zaki Badawi, used to stress that it would be 
wise to remember that in Islam there is no Vatican. Diversity of Shariah 
opinions is a strength and not a weakness. Only that way the Islamic finance 
sector will thrive. 
On the upside, there are signs that the Shariah governance process in Islamic 
finance is steadily evolving and gaining maturity with the latest call by 
prominent Saudi Shariah scholar and economist, Mohamed Elgari, for a scientific 
approach to Shariah compliance. This follows the recent call by another 
prominent Shariah scholar, Sheikh Esam Ishaq of Bahrain, that Shariah 
advisories serving the Islamic finance industry should be regulated. 
Elgari has called on fellow Shariah advisories to adopt a scientific 
methodology in reaching their deliberations on Islamic finance. "To be 
respected," said Elgari, "Shariah scholars should follow scientific methods to 
reach their conclusions. We have seen many mistakes where declarations have 
been issued. Only the correct resolutions will prevail. Shariah is not a group 
of infallible people. It is a science. It requires methodology, and resolutions 
require peer review and market consultation." 
Elgari is also a big supporter of the codification of Fiqh Al-Muamalat, which 
could contribute immensely to clarifying the rubrics and the contentious issues 
relating to products and services in the nascent Islamic finance industry. 
Similarly, he believes that greater transparency in the Shariah governance 
process, more professional articulation of the resolutions and statements, and 
prior debate and consultation between scholars and other stakeholders in the 
industry, could go a long way in mitigating the misconceptions and confusion 
that has arisen as a result of some of the recent Shariah rulings. 
The market impact of these developments is real. Some bankers such as Mohammed 
Tariq, head of treasury at the Islamic Development Bank, agree that the AAOIFI 
Shariah Committee ruling is a marginal issue, but has contributed to the 
slowdown in the sukuk market. 
Others such as Badlisyah Abdul Ghani, CEO of CIMB Islamic Bank, are less 
impressed: "The AAOIFI Resolution on musharaka sukuk," he wrote in the May/June 
2009 issue of Islamic Banker, "is rightly based on the provisions of a 
particular School of Islamic Law. However, the resolution cannot invalidate 
musharaka sukuk transactions based on other schools of Islamic law. To 
generalize that musharaka sukuk as currently structured are not 
Shariah-compliant is unjustifiable from a Shariah perspective. In the Shariah 
governance process in Islamic finance it must be appreciated that all schools 
of Islamic law are valid and enforceable in their own right." 
Another major development in August 2009 was the issuance by Bank Negara 
Malaysia of the first in a series of Shariah references. The first one, Shariah 
Parameter Reference 1 or murabaha Parameter (SPR1), will be followed by Shariah 
Parameters on ijarah (leasing), mudaraba (trust financing), musharaka 
(partnerships), istisna (construction financing) and wadiah (current accounts). 
Bank Negara Malaysia stressed that "SPR1 outlines the main Shariah requirements 
in the contracts and provides examples, methods and models for practical 
application of the contract, and is issued as guidance and reference to all 
IFIs. It also marks a key advancement in the bank's efforts to promote greater 
harmonization in the development of the Islamic finance industry." 
Some scholars stress that the Shariah governance process has also got to be 
pragmatic. The Islamic Fiqh Academy, for instance, recommends that "to ensure 
that Islamic banking and financial institutions adopt investmentand financing 
techniques that are Shariah-compliant in all its activities, they should avoid 
all dubious and prohibited financial techniques. All transactions must conform 
to Shariah rules in order to ensure it meets the objectives of Shariah (Maqasid 
Shariah). In addition, such a move will ensure the progress and actualization 
of the socio-economic objectives of the Muslim world. If the current situation 
is not rectified, the Muslim world would continue to face serious challenges 
and economic imbalances that will never end. The council encourages the 
application of Qard Al-Hasan and establishment of Qard Al-Hasan funds by 
financial institutions to shift people who are in need of fund from products 
such as Tawarruq." 
The concern raised by some of the Shariah scholars, who questioned this ruling, 
explains Mohammed Akram Laldin, executive director of ISRA (International 
Shariah Research Academy for Islamic Finance), the publisher of this 
e-newsletter, is based on the fact that most of the existing portfolios and 
products of IFIs globally are based on the mechanism of commodity murabahah 
based on the tawarruq mode. "If such transactions are deemed to be 
nonpermissible, then an alternative must be in place to facilitate such 
transactions which are worth billions of dollars," he added. 
The suggested use of Qard Al-Hasan, adds Laldin, has yet to be tested in the 
market. "The very nature of the Qard Al-Hasan that specifically disallows the 
taking of any additional profit or increase over and above the principal given 
would impose a major restriction on the Islamic finance industry. In addition, 
the fee that can be charged on the implementation of the Qard Al-Hasan must be 
the actual fee incurred in administering the transaction," he explains. 
Some Shariah scholars maintain that the imposition of such restrictions as the 
above might affect the rapid development of the industry going forward. Until 
Islamic finance achieves a reasonable level of total financial services market 
share, surely there has to be some room for "exceptional need" or necessity in 
the absence of viable alternatives. As long of course this need remains within 
the parameters allowed by the Shariah. 
Scholars such as Sheikh Esam Ishaq of Bahrain would like greater inter-action 
with regulators. He stresses that scholars do engage with them in advising and 
counseling over matters relating to Fiqh Al-Muamalat. "If they are Muslim 
regulators, we do remind them that they cannot be ambivalent of the religious 
dimension of Islamic finance, which is faith-based," he says. 
The Islamic finance market is growing in tandem with the increasing awareness 
of the general public of Islamic finance per se and of the Shariah supervision 
process over the last decade or so. People are now more demanding and want 
proper regulation of Shariah boards. 
Sheikh Esam stresses that he is "definitely in favor of regulating Shariah 
advisories by some peer group or organization. But this process should be 
pragmatic. I agree that having the right education and skills sets to give 
Shariah advice relating to Fiqh Al-Muamalat are important aspects to this 
process. There should also be a limit to the number of Shariah boards any 
single advisory can sit on." 
 
 
ALLAH BLESSES MOHAMMAD AND GIVES HIM PEACE
 
Your Brother; 
NIDAL ALSAYYED, PhD Researcher, Islamic Banking and Finance
www.INCEIF.org & www.ISRA.my
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel. +60172559700, Fax. +603 414 70700
 
Email(1): [email protected]
Email(2): [email protected]
Email(3): [email protected]
Email(4): [email protected]
 
On Google: http://groups.google.com/group/nidal_islamic-finance
On LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alsayyed
On Skype: nidal_IslamicFinance
On Fringe: nsayed70
On Facebook: [email protected] 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kantakji Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group لفك الاشتراك من المجموعة أرسل للعنوان التالي 
رسالة فارغة, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/kantakjigroup?hl=en
سياسة النشر في المجموعة:
- ترك ما عارض أهل السنة والجماعة.
- الاكتفاء بأمور ذات علاقة بالاقتصاد الإسلامي وعلومه ولو بالشيء البسيط. ويستثنى 
من هذا مايتعلق بالشأن 
العام على مستوى الأمة كحدث غزة مثلا.
- عدم ذكر ما يتعلق بشخص طبيعي أو اعتباري بعينه. باستثناء الأمر العام الذي يهم 
عامة المسلمين.
-  تمرير بعض الأشياء الخفيفة المسلية ضمن قواعد الأدب وخاصة منها التي تأتي من 
أعضاء لا يشاركون عادة، والقصد من ذلك تشجيعهم على التفاعل الإيجابي.
- ترك المديح الشخصي.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

رد على