Robert, Ant,
I created a JIRA issue about the creation of the components for Kato a
few days ago (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KATO-1 ). Is
there any further step I need to take to have the components created
on JIRA?
Thank you!
Carmine
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Carmine Cristallo
<carminecrista...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
> Here's the list of the components to be created on Jira.
>
> - TCK (for the Test Compliance Toolkit)
> - API (for the API specification)
> - RI (for the Reference Implementation)
> - HARNESS (for the test harness)
> - NMAT (for the Native Memory Analysis Tool)
> - RTEX (for the RunTime Explorer)
> - PROCEX (for the Process Explorer)
> - RTI (for the RunTime Investigator)
> - JDICONN (for the JDI Connector).
>
> I've created a JIRA task for this item. Ant/Robert... was this the
> right thing to do?
> Thank you!
>
> Carmine
>
>
> Carmine
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Carmine Cristallo
> <carminecrista...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello!
>> I'm starting to think about what the component structure will look
>> like. In one of his previous postings, Steve suggested the following:
>>
>>> Create components in the Kato Jira instance. We have the following obvious
>>> areas - is this a reasonable split?
>>> - Test Compliance Kit. Items under this component would cover TCK
>>> development and issues arrising about execution validity.
>>> - API specification - items here would cover user story creation, bugs in
>>> the spec and spec development
>>> - Reference Implementation (nuf said)
>>> - Test Harness. The TCK is only one part of the test suite. What we are
>>> developing needs a complex test setup and execution environment - its big
>>> enough to need its own component
>>
>> I would also suggest one component for each of the demo tools we will
>> create, although these may be created at a later stage, since the
>> tools boundaries are still far from being definite.
>>
>> What do you think? I would like to call a vote on this list on Friday,
>> so please post your comments before then.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>>
>> Carmine
>>
>
