On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:00:32AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:21:15 +0000 (GMT), > Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> make bzlilo modules modules_install: it would be a simble > >> make install: (and you configure with CML1/CML2 what install > >> means). > > > >How does it handle that when install means different things on each box of > >a set of them NFS sharing the kernel tree. This is a real world example > > I made kbuild 2.5 install very flexible to cater for cases like this. > The answer depends on whether you want every compile to be the same > with different install steps on the target machines or each compile is > different. > > In the different compile case you have a single source tree (mounted > read only if you like) and separate object trees for each compile run. > The .config lives in the object directory so is machine local. The > object trees can be NFS mounted or can use local disk on each build > machine, as a bonus this avoids NFS writes and runs much faster. > > If you want a common compile on one machine followed by different > installs on each machine then you have three choices. > > (1) make install with an install prefix path (say /var/tmp) will > install the kernel, modules, System.map and .config in a holding > directory on the build machine, the other machines can then copy > the install data to wherever they need it. Whether the copy is > done from the build machine to the target directories or on the > target machine is an NFS implementation detail. > > (2) make installable (the default target) on the build machine then run > make install with overrides on the target machines. All the > install config variables are exposed for override on the install > step. > > (3) make installable on the build machine with .config specifying an > install script name. Then make install on each target system, the > version of the install script is local to the target machine. > > If none of those suit your environment, let me know what you are trying > to achieve and I will see about adding support to kbuild 2.5.
Would it be easy to add hooks for make-rpm and make-kpkg and alike, as methods for make installable? /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
