Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know. How is it harder to validate
> choice kernel_format_PPC
> VMLINUX ZIMAGE ZNETBOOT
> default ZIMAGE
> choice kernel_format_ix86
> VMLINUX ZIMAGE BZIMAGE BZDISK
> default BZIMAGE
> Than:
> choice kernel_format
> VMLINUX ZIMAGE BZIMAGE ZNETBOOT
> defeult ((X86) : BZIMAGE ? ((IA64 or SPARC) ? VMLINUZ : ZIMAGE))
> unless X86 suppress BZIMAGE
> unless PPC suppress ZNETBOOT
That's not a bad case. The case I'm worried about is the one where the
choice menus get split into different files and can't be eyeballed at
the same time easily.
> > There's a problem like this now with unless/suppress declarations, but
> > I saw no way to avoid it there.
>
> I guess I didn't read the other posts thourghly enough, what's the exact
> problem?
Information distributed through the ruleset in such a way that it's hard
to know all the places a given symbol participates.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
Never trust a man who praises compassion while pointing a gun at you.
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
