On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:57:10PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > P.S. Can we seperate "add new subsystem y prime" and "remove old subsystem > > y". LIke the new and old SCSI error handling, which have been in the tree in > > parallel for some time? Did I hear Eric ever suggest removing the old > > configurator for 2.4? Anybody? > > The whole point of putting the new configurator in would be to be able > to drop the old one out. > > But that would be strictly Marcelo's call. It would be up to him to decide > whether the tradeoff were worth it.
Yes, but what people are saying (on this part of the thread) is please don't bother Marcelo with it in the first place. All of the main gripes people have don't apply to the current unstable tree, but most certainly do to the current stable one. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
