On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:51:55AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:20:11 -0700, 
> Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:03:11PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> >> I can live with that - just.  The help text for each of the build
> >> formats must be duplicated, even though VMLINUZ_X86 is _identical_ to
> >> VMLINUZ_IA64.  People who read the rules might think that VMLINUZ has
> >> different formats on the two architectures.  I see lots of comments in
> >> my coding future ...
> >
> >But that's rather nice when BZIMAGE_M68K means a bzip2'ed file and
> >BZIMAGE_X86 means a big zImage. :)
> 
> The same name meaning two different formats is a design error.  User
> says "I have a bzImage file", does that mean they have the correct
> format for the architecture (good) or they copied the bzImage file from
> i386 to m68k (bad) and now they wonder why it will not boot?

The problem is nothing is defined anywhere. :)
As it is, lots of newbies think 'bzImage' is a bzip2'ed zImage of sorts.

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel

Reply via email to