On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 07:57:38PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >                                     Maybe keep them both in the
> > tree until this issue is worked out ? That way those who want to
> > play with kbuild can do so, and those who build a few dozen
> > kernels a day don't have to twiddle thumbs.
> 
> That is such an unutterably horrible concept that the very tentacles
> of Cthulhu himself must twitch in dread at the thought.  The last thing
> anyone sane wants to do is have to maintain two parallel build systems
> at the same time.

Then it does seem reasonable to ask that the new one is at least as fast
as the old one.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel

Reply via email to