On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 07:57:38PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Maybe keep them both in the > > tree until this issue is worked out ? That way those who want to > > play with kbuild can do so, and those who build a few dozen > > kernels a day don't have to twiddle thumbs. > > That is such an unutterably horrible concept that the very tentacles > of Cthulhu himself must twitch in dread at the thought. The last thing > anyone sane wants to do is have to maintain two parallel build systems > at the same time.
Then it does seem reasonable to ask that the new one is at least as fast as the old one. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel