Hi, Scott Bronson wrote:
> The interface is kind of raw, though I see what you're trying to do. > I disagree with putting everything in a tree list -- that requires way > too much clicking to configure a kernel. Also, it's scary to be > presented with every option at once. It's easy to get lost. If you only use the mouse, I can understand that it can get difficult. On the other hand the tree structure is a very convenient if you use the keyboard. > I find > the original xconfig windowing interface much nicer to use. Actually I find xconfig more confusing. :) Anyway, currently I'm working on the back end and filling the holes of the specification. UI issues are somewhat down on my list, so it will stay rather simple for a while. On the other hand I'll try to implement a decent interface to the config information, so that people can easily implement whatever front end they like (one such front end e.g. might be the extraction of build information). > Are you going to continue to develop this? Unless everyone tells that my work is useless, yes. Right now I would be most interested in a technical discussion how the kernel should be configured. We have now two possible implementations and I'm really surprised that I didn't got any feedback from ESR so far. :( bye, Roman _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
