On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:23:24PM +0200, Sebastian Heidl wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Nice, but what about decrypted version?
> It's signed. Just pipe it through gpg with Keiths public key.

Signed means that there is a checksum at the bottom that you can verify with
gpg/pgp to see if the message was tampered with, but the text itself it
still in ascii and not encoded.

This looks encrypted to me.


kbuild-devel mailing list

Reply via email to