Hi, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Well, my basic preference is > > * something other than Config.new (the original name in your config system) > * something other than Config.in > > I think it is a mistake to name a totally different format the same name > as an older format... even "config.in" would be better than "Config.in"... My first plan was to use Config.in, but I can't overwrite the old files yet, so I named it Config.new. Personally I only prefer that it starts with a capital letter (like Makefile, Readme), so it's at the top of a dir listing, but otherwise I don't care much about the name. bye, Roman ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
