On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Brendan J Simon wrote: | Roman Zippel wrote: | | >>But the fact that xconfig depends on QT is going to make some people hate | >>it. | >> | >> | >This should be rather easily fixable, but it has to be done by someone who | >is more familiar with whatever prefered toolkit. I'm familiar with QT and | >it's absolutely great to get quickly reasonable results, if someone wants | >something else I gladly will help, but I can't do it myself. | >The interface to the back end is quite simple so it should be no real | >problem to add a different user interface. | > | | This is a difficult one. GUI's toolkits are a bit of religion | (fundamentalist types too). | [good descriptions snipped] | | I'm pretty sure there is no one solution and it comes down to the | politics and preferences of the final decision makers up the heirarchy. | | Good luck,
stick with TCL/TK, like xconfig currently uses ? or is it not sufficient? or just too ugly? -- ~Randy "In general, avoiding problems is better than solving them." -- from "#ifdef Considered Harmful", Spencer & Collyer, USENIX 1992. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
