On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 08:19:23PM +0100, BlaisorBlade wrote: > Makefile.build change is just cosmetic(changing the shown tag; I must change > it more to fix the filename alignment; but why don't you use a tab for > this?). The Makefile.lib, instead, is the core change: objects listed in > UML_USER_OBJS get completely different CFLAGS.
Please don't use shouting names.. > The list always contains, in the arch/um subfolders, all objects whose name > matches %_user.o(as it has always been for UML). This doesn't sound like a good heuristic, imagine a driver using e.g. foo_user.c for the chardev user interface. In general I'd suggest adding parallel infrastructure for user-$(CONFIG_FOO) variables in addition to the current obj-* and host-*. The only problem you could get with that is that you need to take special care of the link order. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
