On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 07:16:23AM -0500, Joachim Förster wrote:
>
> So, hmmm ... I tried to handle a "kernel-inside" module as it was a
> module outside of the kernel source tree:
>
> make -C $KERNEL_SOURCE_TREE SUBDIRS=$KERNEL_SOURCE_TREE/fs/fat modules
>
> Bevor that, I configured with menuconfig and enabled other stuff to be
> built as modules, too.
> This seems to work, because in this case only fat.ko is built.
>
> Is this an "legal" way? Or is it against principles?
I never thought about this use, but I see nothing wrong with it.
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
