On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:41:59AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > Remove the note in the documentation that suggests people can use > > "requires" for dependencies in Kconfig files. > >... > > Considering that noone uses it, what about the patch below to also > remove the implementation?
... big snip ... i have no problem knocking out of the parser anything related to "depends" or "requires." in fact, i did note in earlier patch submissions that i was just cleaning the Kconfig files but i was leaving the parser alone, and someone else was welcome to take care of that. if the kbuild folks are good with this, i certainly have no objection. rday p.s. i didn't look closely enough to see if your patch took out support for both "depends" *and* "requires". at this point, neither of those are necessary anymore -- it's all "depends on" except for three remaining Kconfig files. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
