On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Oleg.
Hallo. Nice, you are bringing it back. I'll try to have LKML-like output this time, not a makefile mess and stuff: [] > I see no value in renaming from asm_offset to asm_value - please drop it. > Introducing the generic asm-values.h should wait and when you do > you should be preapred to update all architectures (ecasue otherwise it > will not happen). All archs, are using same syntax. But. Interesting exception is MIPS, where tokens are organized and implemented more nicely, that is where *asm-values* name coming from, actually. One can see all that text, size, constant tokens in addition to just offsets. So, if name change isn't worth, then OK; filename compatibility check, as one in `linux/Kbuild', is easy to hack as well to remove. But nice feature/tool with meaningful name and functionality is just another thing. Opinions? ____ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
