On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 12:23:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:58:03 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for > > > kbuild. > > > The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: > > ... > > > o add script to find unused kconfig symbols (try it!) > > > > based on my experiences with this, unless you filter carefully, you're > > going to end up with a *whack* of false positives given the number of > > developers who elect to name their local macros starting with a prefix > > of "CONFIG_". good luck dealing with *that*. :-) > > box:/usr/src/linux-2.6.23-rc6> grep -r '^[ ]*#[ ]*define[ > ]*CONFIG_' . | wc -l > 415 > > bah. They're all bugs - The CONFIG_foo namespace is (should be) reserved in > kernel coding.
I get (after a bit more filtering 349 hits of which 182 are outside drivers/ Of the 182 the 25 of them are in arch specific code. I se no good reasons to address this unless we touch code in that area anyway. But avoiding new entries are good. Sam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel