On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:06:10PM +0000, Igor Mitsyanko wrote:
> Thanks Dan!
> 
> @Sergey I think we do not need !skb check at all in this function, 
> agree? I assume if we remove "if (ret && skb)" it will make smatch happy?
> 

Yes.  Smatch only cares about consistent checking.  Or it will accept
inconsistent NULL checks so long as it is convinced that the pointer
can't be NULL.

regards,
dan carpenter
 
_______________________________________________
kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.org

Reply via email to