CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
TO: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
CC: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
CC: "Patrick Stählin" <[email protected]>
CC: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

From: kernel test robot <[email protected]>

arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:260:3-6: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if 
condition followed by BUG.
Please make sure the condition has no side effects (see conditional BUG_ON 
definition in include/asm-generic/bug.h)

 Use BUG_ON instead of a if condition followed by BUG.

Semantic patch information:
 This makes an effort to find cases where BUG() follows an if
 condition on an expression and replaces the if condition and BUG()
 with a BUG_ON having the conditional expression of the if statement
 as argument.

Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/bugon.cocci

Fixes: c22b0bcb1dd0 ("riscv: Add kprobes supported")
CC: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
---

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 
master
head:   5695e51619745d4fe3ec2506a2f0cd982c5e27a4
commit: c22b0bcb1dd024cb9caad9230e3a387d8b061df5 riscv: Add kprobes supported
:::::: branch date: 3 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 6 weeks ago

Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!

 kprobes.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -256,8 +256,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struc
                 * normal page fault.
                 */
                regs->epc = (unsigned long) cur->addr;
-               if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
-                       BUG();
+               BUG_ON(!instruction_pointer(regs));
 
                if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
                        restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
_______________________________________________
kbuild mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to