CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
TO: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
CC: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
CC: Andy Gross <[email protected]>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
CC: Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]

From: kernel test robot <[email protected]>

drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c:1318:1-33: WARNING: Function 
"for_each_available_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before return 
around line 1321.


Semantic patch information:
 False positives can be due to function calls within the for_each
 loop that may encapsulate an of_node_put.

Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/for_each_child.cocci

Fixes: 14e2976fbabd ("regulator: qcom_smd: Align probe function with 
rpmh-regulator")
CC: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
---

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 
master
head:   112450df61b7373529b0fe4c122ad13b89d80a8a
commit: 14e2976fbabdacb01335d7f91eeebbc89c67ddb1 regulator: qcom_smd: Align 
probe function with rpmh-regulator
:::::: branch date: 13 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 9 days ago

Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!

 qcom_smd-regulator.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
@@ -1317,8 +1317,10 @@ static int rpm_reg_probe(struct platform
 
        for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, node) {
                vreg = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*vreg), GFP_KERNEL);
-               if (!vreg)
+               if (!vreg) {
+                       of_node_put(node);
                        return -ENOMEM;
+               }
 
                ret = rpm_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, rpm, vreg_data);
 
_______________________________________________
kbuild mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to