I don't know if
I'll be able to join your team since I'm pretty far along with my efforts in
research and implementation, and I have a lot of confidence in the overall
approach I'm taking. I'll be glad to compare notes though.
Depending on how things go in the next few days, I'll know just how much
computing power I will be needing, so I may be looking for minority-share
team members.
Remember, once someone passes
the 0.8563 mark (and I do believe it will happen in the next few weeks),
everyone else will have 30 days to match/beat their progress before a winner
is examined/judged/declared.
btw, sorry my
emails are dated wrongly... I'll fix it later. :)
-----Original Message-----
From: "David Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kcpm
<[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:21:18 -0500
Subject: Re: [Kc] meeting Tuesday Oct 10 2006
I set up a team called "Kansas City" please respond to me if you
would like added to it :) 10 pm at chubby's we'll draft internal team
agreements; draft milestones; management-type wheel-spinning
On 10/5/06, Matthew Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Perhaps... I've got a testing/development framework up and going, and a
pile
> of relevant academic PDFs on collaborative filtering and recommender
> systems.
>
> I've created a team already (no submissions yet), but the rules state
that
> users can be members of more than one team.
>
> How about "KC Perl Mongers" for our team name
_______________________________________________
kc mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
