Thanks! You all helped a lot. I think the boss is gonna pick DBIx::Class.
To quote the folks on #perl @ irc.freenode.net:
14:46:25< zostay> can somebody summarize the diff between Classs::DBI
andDBIx::Class? i want to make sure i remember correctly before answer aPM list
message
14:49:28 < mst> zostay: DBIx::Class obsoletes Class::DBI
14:49:48 < cfedde> DBIx::Class works better.
14:50:03 < zostay> then my memory serves... :)
14:50:27< mst> zostay: DBIx::Class also provides a full compatibilitylayer for
Class::DBI, which in 08100 is better tested than Class::DBIand being maintained
by Scgwern himself
14:51:35 < cfedde> s/cg/ch/
Cheers,
Sterling (aka zostay)
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Kit Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am personally enamoured with DBIC, and most of the Catalyst
documentation that I'm seeing assumes DBIC. If I had to choose, I'd
go with DBIC right now.
KP
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:35 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your responces. My boss is doing the whole
> standardize thing. Luckily I have pretty well sealed the deal for us keeping
> Perl, and even using Catalyst. But What I was curious about was Which is
> better? DBIx::Class or Class::DBI. I read each one's description on cpan. and
> couln't pick out a clear advantage between them.
>
> Any advice would be a great help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James Carman
> _______________________________________________
> kc mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
>
--
GPG public key fingerpint: 1A12 04B6 0C80 306A B292 14FD 2C7A 1037 F666 46A7
_______________________________________________
kc mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
_______________________________________________
kc mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
