I'm not suggesting we remove explaining bless. I'm suggesting that in addition to showing someone pipe, we also explain useful pipe-related tools like cat, echo, tee, and xargs. It is a tutorial after all.
There's been about 10 years worth of tools to help with bless since that document was written. On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:29 PM, David Nicol <[email protected]> wrote: > is it a deficiency? Are you going to bowdlerize "pipe" out of command > line terminology too while you're at it? WORKSFORME NOTABUG DONTFIX > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Sterling Hanenkamp > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Buahaha! So true... I should see if the perl-documentation project has > any > > plans to correct that particular deficiency. > > The movie is Race to Witch Mountain. Do not recommend. > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:16 PM, David Nicol <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> "toot the blessed hash" jokes > -- Andrew Sterling Hanenkamp [email protected] 785.370.4454
_______________________________________________ kc mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
