|
Given
the other answers, you now know some of the legalities behind it. However,
ethics does not always directly correspond with laws. Even ethics does not put
food on the table or pay the bills. For me, the question always comes down to,
who would get hurt in the deal. If the answer is no one, or the only big
corporate owner isn't doing anything with the product, then I'm a lot more
likely to consider something like that. Obviously, you have to be aware that if
your product makes money, you could be liable for money on down the road, but
come on, we're Americans here, and we never worry about things in the future.
The other fun thing to consider is just rewriting the same application over
without looking at any of the current code. Then, it comes down to patentable
ideas, which is probably something the company wouldn't get involved
in.
Bruce Dunwiddie
|
- [KCFusion] ethics Adaryl Wakefield
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Bruce Dunwiddie
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Katsuey
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Bruce Dunwiddie
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Katsuey
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Kory Bakken
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Adam Dayhoff
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Katsuey
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Hale, Frederick L, WCS
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Templin, Luke
- RE: [KCFusion] ethics Safley, Nicole
